<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Martini Lab Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinilab.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog</link>
	<description>Web design, CSS, scripting, Adobe, tips and other scraps of things that come my way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:56:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tackling Safari&#8217;s slow gif &#8220;feature&#8221; with jQuery by Tim Gurske</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/75/tackling-safaris-slow-gif-feature-with-jquery/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gurske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=75#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Thanks, that helped me alot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, that helped me alot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun with WebKit css gradients by Chris Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/104/fun-with-webkit-css-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=104#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with that.  I suppose my take on text shadow come from already avoiding using graphics in place of text to begin with (or as much as possible). Text-shadow is just adding in an effect that I&#039;ve already let go of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with that.  I suppose my take on text shadow come from already avoiding using graphics in place of text to begin with (or as much as possible). Text-shadow is just adding in an effect that I&#8217;ve already let go of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun with WebKit css gradients by David Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/104/fun-with-webkit-css-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>David Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=104#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only benefit of text-shadow is not downloading graphics for what can be expressed in css.&quot;

I&#039;m going to disagree there, there are plenty of benefits other than reducing bandwidth. The other css properties you mentioned, yes those benefits are mostly just visual/graphic. But text styles are much, much different. Off the top of my head:

- There are SEO improvements by using HTML text instead of images
- likewise there are improvements with compatibility with vision impaired people using screenreaders
- people with reduced visual acuity can apply custom styles to increase the font size of css/html text that they wouldn&#039;t be able to with images (in the same way), and pages can be designed to flow around this modification
- HTML text responds to browsers&#039; find-in-page functions so users will be able jump to text while they couldn&#039;t jump to text in image
- you can specify a simpler print style, reducing the ink use dramatically by not having to print an entire image
- the content is much easier to make dynamic (updating via DHTML/Ajax/etc), or just to show dynamic content (e.g. displaying a data-derived page title in a content management system)
- the text is selectable

Good examples of css gradients though, that album example in particular was just beautiful. Thanks for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only benefit of text-shadow is not downloading graphics for what can be expressed in css.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to disagree there, there are plenty of benefits other than reducing bandwidth. The other css properties you mentioned, yes those benefits are mostly just visual/graphic. But text styles are much, much different. Off the top of my head:</p>
<p>- There are SEO improvements by using HTML text instead of images<br />
- likewise there are improvements with compatibility with vision impaired people using screenreaders<br />
- people with reduced visual acuity can apply custom styles to increase the font size of css/html text that they wouldn&#8217;t be able to with images (in the same way), and pages can be designed to flow around this modification<br />
- HTML text responds to browsers&#8217; find-in-page functions so users will be able jump to text while they couldn&#8217;t jump to text in image<br />
- you can specify a simpler print style, reducing the ink use dramatically by not having to print an entire image<br />
- the content is much easier to make dynamic (updating via DHTML/Ajax/etc), or just to show dynamic content (e.g. displaying a data-derived page title in a content management system)<br />
- the text is selectable</p>
<p>Good examples of css gradients though, that album example in particular was just beautiful. Thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun with WebKit css gradients by RyanMorr</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/104/fun-with-webkit-css-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanMorr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=104#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Actually, browser detection isn&#039;t neccessary. I recently wrote a method capable of detecting support for any CSS styles in Javascript; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ryanmorr.com/archives/detecting-browser-css-style-support&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ryanmorr.com/archives/detecting-browser-css-style-support&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, browser detection isn&#8217;t neccessary. I recently wrote a method capable of detecting support for any CSS styles in Javascript; <a href="http://ryanmorr.com/archives/detecting-browser-css-style-support" rel="nofollow">http://ryanmorr.com/archives/detecting-browser-css-style-support</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun with WebKit css gradients by Ajaxian &#187; CSS Gradients in Action</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/104/fun-with-webkit-css-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajaxian &#187; CSS Gradients in Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=104#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] Williams has been having some fun with CSS gradients on a quest to create nice looking elements without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Williams has been having some fun with CSS gradients on a quest to create nice looking elements without [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on -webkit-background-clip Problems by Fun with WebKit css gradients &#124; Martini Lab Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/91/webkit-background-clip-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Fun with WebKit css gradients &#124; Martini Lab Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=91#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] a follow up to yesterday’s woeful tale of using WebKit’s proprietary css properties, I wanted to follow up with a couple examples of how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a follow up to yesterday’s woeful tale of using WebKit’s proprietary css properties, I wanted to follow up with a couple examples of how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A better jQuery slider by Harley</title>
		<link>http://www.martinilab.com/blog/25/a-better-jquery-slider/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinilab.com/blog/?p=25#comment-12</guid>
		<description>that is pretty badass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is pretty badass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
